Gundersen v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
This case involves the scope of a person’s due process right to challenge the result of a breath test that the police administer after the person is arrested for driving while intoxicated. We have held that in order to introduce the result of the police-administered breath test in evidence, due process requires that the state preserve a sample of the defendant’s breath for independent testing. The issue in this case is whether the state may satisfy a defendant’s due process rights without preserving his breath sample if it provides notice *674of his right to an independent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. PecoraroIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SpurgeonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Municipality of Anchorage v. RayCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.