Legal Opinion

Gundersen v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1990No. S-3219PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case involves the scope of a person’s due process right to challenge the result of a breath test that the police administer after the person is arrested for driving while intoxicated. We have held that in order to introduce the result of the police-administered breath test in evidence, due process requires that the state preserve a sample of the defendant’s breath for independent testing. The issue in this case is whether the state may satisfy a defendant’s due process rights without preserving his breath sample if it provides notice *674of his right to an independent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. PecoraroIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. SpurgeonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. RayCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
  5. Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API