Legal Opinion

Puller v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1978No. 3232PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

Appellant James Puller was arrested in Anchorage and charged with driving while intoxicated. 1 At trial in district court, Puller moved to suppress evidence of his refusal to take a breathalyzer test. The motion was denied; and evidence was admitted, over Puller’s objection, indicating that Puller refused a breathalyzer test. The jury was instructed that it could consider Puller’s ■ refusal to submit to the test as evidence of guilt of the offense of driving while intoxicated. 2 Puller…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. SeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Dotson v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. FyfeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Roth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  3. Croft v. Pan Alaska Trucking, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. CharlesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API