Puller v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.
Appellant James Puller was arrested in Anchorage and charged with driving while intoxicated. 1 At trial in district court, Puller moved to suppress evidence of his refusal to take a breathalyzer test. The motion was denied; and evidence was admitted, over Puller’s objection, indicating that Puller refused a breathalyzer test. The jury was instructed that it could consider Puller’s ■ refusal to submit to the test as evidence of guilt of the offense of driving while intoxicated. 2 Puller…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. SeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Dotson v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. FyfeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Roth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- Croft v. Pan Alaska Trucking, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. CharlesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.