Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. Mills

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1999No. 980127PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] William R. Mills, Betty L. Mills, Da-kotaville, Inc., and River Woods West, Inc. (“Mills”) appeal from a judgment determining the ordinary high watermark of the Missouri River on certain disputed property. We conclude the trial court did not err in determining the ordinary high watermark based upon the current condition of the river, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The State brought a declaratory judgment action to determine the parties’ interests in certain land lying along the Missouri River near Bismarck. The disputed land constitutes approximately 62 acres of “shore…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hogue v. BourgoisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State of California v. Superior Court (Fogerty)California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. United States v. Southern Investment Company, Southern Investment Company, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Benson v. Feland Brothers PropertiesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Norby v. Estate of KuykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Norby v. Estate of KuykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API