Legal Opinion

J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1988No. Civ. 870075PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

We consider whether a man-made change in the course of the navigable Missouri River affects ownership of oil and gas underlying the former riverbed. Applying a statute derived from Napoleonic and Roman law through the Field Code, we hold that it does. Therefore, we reverse a summary judgment declining to apply the statute.

FACTS

In 1957, the United States of America acquired land by eminent domain in section 15, Township 152, Range 103, McKenzie County, from Emery Papineau. The condemnation decree stipulated that Papineau retained “all oil and gas rights.”

After acquiring the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Zuger v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. McLean v. Kirby Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kim-Go, H.K. Minerals, Inc. v. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Harwood State Bank v. CharonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API