Legal Opinion
State of California v. Superior Court (Fogerty)
California Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1981No. S.F. 24035PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*243Opinion
MOSK, J.
The present action is concerned with the ownership of lands between high and low water in Lake Tahoe, a navigable lake in which there is no appreciable ebb and flow of the tide. The primary issues are the same as those discussed in State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon) (1981) ante, page 210 [172 Cal.Rptr. 696, 625 P.2d 239], but some questions in addition to those in the Lyon action are raised by the parties.
In the spring of 1977, the State Lands Commission, after being advised by the Attorney General that the state claimed ownership of the property between high and low…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)California Supreme Court · 1981
- California Trout, Inc. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.