Legal Opinion
Molski v. Arciero Wine Group
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 2008No. B199289PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COFFEE, J.
Jarek Molski appeals from an order awarding attorney fees in the amount of $33,702.63 to respondent Arciero Winery Group (Arciero). In this lawsuit over disability access to Arciero’s winery, Arciero obtained judgment in its favor on all causes of action. Molski contends that Arciero should not have been awarded its attorneys fees as a prevailing party under Civil Code section 55 1 because Molski’s claims were not frivolous, unreasonable or groundless. Alternatively, Molski contends that the award should be reduced. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Molski is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Victor Barrios v. California Interscholastic Federation California Interscholastic Federation Opinion Southern SectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Donald v. Cafe Royale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jankey v. Song Koo LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Carruthers v. Carrier Access Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Turner v. Ass'n of American Medical CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- C.B. v. Sonora School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Hubbard v. SOBRECK, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.