Ruggles v. Yagong.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
McKENNA, J.
I. Introduction
Petitioners, a group of pro se individuals from Hawai'i County, present the following question: “Did the Intermediate Court of Appeals err in determining that the Lowest Law Enforcement Priority of Cannabis, a voter sponsored initiative, in its entirety is in conflict with State laws, and is thus preempted by them?” We answer this question in the negative. Our case law holds that a municipal ordinance may be preempted by state law “if (1) it covers the same subject matter embraced within a comprehensive state statutory scheme disclosing an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- O'CONNELL v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Amemiya v. SapienzaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Ruggles v. YagongHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
3Cited by6 opinions
- George Young, Jr. v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Hooker v. Illinois State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. TranHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
- Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
- Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.