Legal Opinion

Ruggles v. Yagong

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2014No. CAAP-13-0000117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

FOLEY, J.

Pro se Plaintiffs-Appellants Michael Doyle Ruggles, Rev. Nancy Waite Hams, Kenneth V. Miyamoto-Slaughter, Wendy Tatum, David Tatum, and Robert S. Murray (collectively, Plaintiffs) appeal from the January 28, 2013 Final Judgment entered in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit1 (circuit court), in favor of the following County of Hawai'i public officials, Defendants-Appellees Dominic Yagong, Donald Ikeda, J. Yoshimoto, Dennis Onishi, Fred Bias, Brittany Smart, Brenda Ford, Angel Pilago, Pete Hoffman, Jay Ki-mura, Mitchell Roth, Charlene Iboshi, Billy Kenoi,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Amemiya v. SapienzaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stallard v. Consolidated Maui, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Marsland v. First Hawaiian BankHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Territory v. LucasHawaii Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. Yagong.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ruggles v. Yagong.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Ruggles v. Yagong.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API