Legal Opinion

Petition of Willmus

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 9, 1997No. C7-96-2617PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that respondent’s land was unencumbered by an easement benefiting appellant. Appellant also makes claims regarding the district court’s alleged violations of the law of the case doctrine and the Statute of Frauds. We affirm the district court’s ruling that the easement does not encumber respondent’s property, and we do not address the other claims.

FACTS

In 1962, John and Catherine Moga commissioned and later registered Land Survey Number 189 (RLS 189) splitting a parcel of their land into two tracts, A and B. RLS 189…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Merceil Burkhalter v. Dedrick D. Mays, Building Trades Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API