People v. Byrnes
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Frank G. Finlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the-court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant was convicted upon an indictment charging him with committing the crime of grand larceny.
He appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The scheme, trick, and device by means whereof the property of one Friesz was stolen, is fully described in an opinion of this court filed in the case of People v. Rial, 23 Cal. App. 713, [139 Pac. 661], the theory of the prosecution being that defendant was the one therein referred to as the “man behind the counter,” who, as shown, aided and abetted Rial in the commission of the crime for which the latter was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. GlassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- People v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CastanedaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- State v. FrancisArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- People v. ChannellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.