Legal Opinion

People v. Bird

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1899No. Crim. No. 480PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment upon a verdict convicting him of forgery, and from a refusal of a new trial. Defendant was employed as clerk by G. J. Griffith, and is prosecuted for forging his employer’s name to a .check on the First National Bank of Los Angeles for two hundred dollars, with intent to defraud Griffith and the bank. <■

It was proved that defendant presented the check to the bank; and obtained the money thereon, and Griffith testified that he, the witness, did not draw the check and had not authorized defendant to do so; and, further, that the money drawn was not used by him,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Crowell v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. SindiciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. State v. KelliherOregon Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API