Legal Opinion

Gretsch v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 28, 1917No. 2240PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Thos. G. Haight, Judge. Mark J. Gretsch was convicted of conspiracy, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.

In September, 1914, the defendant below, Mark J. Gretsch, and his partner, A. Birnbaum, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy in the District Court of New Jersey. Soon afterward they were indicted for concealing property from their trustee, and Gretsch was convicted; Birnbaum entering a plea of guilty. Early in March, 1916, we were obliged to set aside the conviction (Gretsch v. U. S., 231 Fed. 57, 145 C. C. A. 245) because the concealment had not taken place in the district, and within a few weeks thereafter another indictment was found charging the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Photo-Drama Motion Picture Co. v. Social Uplift Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  3. Knoell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  4. Tapack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  5. Gretsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mininsohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. People v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Graboyes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
  4. Nee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
  5. State v. ReichertOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API