Legal Opinion
Mininsohn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 25, 1939No. 6610, 6654PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The appellants contend that insufficient evidence of guilt was presented to the jury to sustain their conviction upon a charge of conspiracy to defraud the United States by obtaining the payment of false and fraudulent claims.
Jacob Mininsohn and Max Mininsohn were officers of and controlled the appellant Interstate Lumber Company. Interstate Lumber Company entered into a contract with the Procurement Division of the Department of the Treasury to sell and deliver a number of barrels of cement to the Jersey Homesteads Project. Under the contract each barrel was to contain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. MacAndrews & Forbes Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
- Meyers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. NearingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Novotny v. Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1252, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8576 John R. Novotny v. Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association, John A. Virostek, Joseph E. Bugel, John J. Dravecky, Daniel T. Kubasak, Edward J. Lesko, James E. Orris, Joseph A. Prokopovitsh, John G. Micenko and Frank J. VanekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Continental Baking Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.