Nee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Iii Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Charles P. Orr, Judge. Criminal prosecution Iw the United States against Patrick Nee, Henry Jacobs, and John Schrader. Judgment of conviction and defendants separately bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
The three plaintiffs-in-error were tried with one Goodwin for conspiring to violate laws of the United States. Criminal Code, § 37 (Comp. St. § 10201). The indictment contained two counts. The first charged the defendants with combining and conspiring together and with persons unknown to receive, conceal, sell and facilitate the transportation, concealment and sale of smoking opium as prohibited by the Act of February 9, 1909, amended by the Act of January 17, 1914 (Comp. St. §§ 8800-8801Í); the second count charged them with conspiring together and with persons unknown…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Clune v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
- Withaup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Knoell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- Devoe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.