Legal Opinion

State v. Reichert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924No. 18440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This record discloses that the Court of Appeals reversed the common pleas court upon the sole ground of failure to instruct the jury that it should not convict upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, and found no other prejudicial error in the record.

In the face of such a finding, therefore, the chief question for this court to determine is, Did failure of the court to instruct the jury as to the propriety and necessity of corroboration of the testimony of the accomplices constitute reversible error? The fact that the request was refused before argument is not urged, as that is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. People v. CostelloCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  4. Trustees of Brimfield v. Commissioners of PortageOhio Supreme Court · 1840
  5. State v. BetsallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Stevens v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. State v. NealOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. In Re CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Doss v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API