Legal Opinion

State v. Philipps

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1994No. S-93-1035PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

After the sentences imposed upon the defendant-appellant, Carla Philipps, were found by this court not to be excessive and were thus affirmed in State v. Philipps, 242 Neb. 894, 496 N.W.2d 874 (1993), the district court, on its own motion, set a hearing to determine whether the sentences should nonetheless be reduced under the provisions of the resentencing statute found in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2308.01 (Reissue 1989). Upon the challenge of the plaintiff-appellee State, the district court determined that the resentencing statute violates the separation of powers clause…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Slack Nursing Home, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Pick v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BainbridgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. DivisNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API