Beam v. Dugan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The plaintiff sued to quiet title and for an accounting claiming under a sale and two assignments of portions of a land owner’s royalty in oil aggregating one per cent of the total royalty payable to their grantors. Defendants had judgment and the plaintiffs appeal upon typewritten transcripts.
The conveyances to the plaintiffs and to their assignors were executed in March, 1923. In form and substance they are identical. The one to the plaintiffs after describing the real property by metes and bounds recites: “And whereas, said above described property, together with other property, has been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Paxton v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
- Acme Oil and Mining Co. v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Pure Oil Co. v. KindallOhio Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Duvall v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- B & B Sulphur Co. v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.