Legal Opinion
East Cape May Associates v. State
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 29, 1997PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BROCHIN, JA.D.
Plaintiff East Cape May Associates, a limited partnership, owns approximately 100 acres of undeveloped land in the City of Cape May, New Jersey. Most of the property is freshwater wetlands, and both the State and East Cape May agree that it is of “exceptional resource value,” a statutory designation which subjects the property to heightened protection against development. *329N.J.S.A 13:9B-7, -10c; see Rossi v. Division of Coastal Resources, 92 N.J.A.R.2d (Vol.5) 244 (Dep’t of Envtl. Prot. & Energy). An application by East Cape May to develop…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Greenway Development Co. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Karam v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Mt. Olive Complex v. TWP. OF MT. OLIVENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Richard Roeser Professional Builder, Inc. v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- OFP, LLC v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.