Legal Opinion

Shames v. California Travel & Tourism Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2010No. 08-56750PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Michael Shames and Gary Gramkow (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their claims against the California Travel and Tourism Commission (“CTTC”) alleging the CTTC engaged in antitrust price-fixing in violation of the Sherman Act § 1, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and improper meeting practices in violation of California’s Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 11120-11132. The district court held the CTTC was shielded from antitrust liability under the “state action immunity” doctrine, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shames v. CALIFORNIA TRAVEL AND TOURISM COM'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Shames v. California Travel & Tourism CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API