Shames v. California Travel & Tourism Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Michael Shames and Gary Gramkow (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their claims against the California Travel and Tourism Commission (“CTTC”) alleging the CTTC engaged in antitrust price-fixing in violation of the Sherman Act § 1, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and improper meeting practices in violation of California’s Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 11120-11132. The district court held the CTTC was shielded from antitrust liability under the “state action immunity” doctrine, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shames v. CALIFORNIA TRAVEL AND TOURISM COM'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shames v. California Travel & Tourism CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010