Legal Opinion
Shames v. CALIFORNIA TRAVEL AND TOURISM COM'N
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 24, 2010No. 08-56750PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
626 F.3d 1079 (2010)
Michael SHAMES and Gary Gramkow, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CALIFORNIA TRAVEL AND TOURISM COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-56750.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 4, 2010.
Filed November 24, 2010.
Robert C. Fellmeth (argued), Center for Public Interest Law, University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, CA, and Donald G. Rez (briefed), Sullivan, Hill, Lewin, Rez & Engel, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
W. Scott Cameron (argued) and Charles L. Post (briefed),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haley v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Kazenercom Too v. Ibar Development, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Meyberg v. City of Santa CruzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Ya-Wen Hsiao v. Eugene ScaliaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020