Legal Opinion
Shames v. California Travel & Tourism Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 8, 2010No. 08-56750PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc of Plaintiffs-Appellants is granted for the purpose of withdrawing the Opinion filed on June 8, 2010 and published at 607 F.3d 611 (9th Cir.2010), and substituting a superseding Opinion, filed concurrently herewith.
The parties may file new petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc as to the new Opinion in accordance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
OPINION
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Michael Shames and Gary Gramkow (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the dismissal of their claims against the California Travel and Tourism…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shames v. CALIFORNIA TRAVEL AND TOURISM COM'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010