Legal Opinion
In Re Antilia
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 2009No. G041453PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
I
Introduction
We hold the constructive filing doctrine of In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72 [109 Cal.Rptr. 785, 514 P.2d 97] (Benoit) applies to a petition for writ of mandate or prohibition under Penal Code section 1405, subdivision (j), 1 challenging a postjudgment order denying a motion to conduct DNA testing. Because Anthony Patrick Antilia satisfied the requirements for constructive filing, we grant his petition for writ of habeas corpus and deem his notice of appeal filed in December 2008 to constitute a timely filed petition for writ of mandate under section 1405,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curtis Morrison v. Mark PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- MinCal Consumer Law Group v. Carlsbad Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. JAHANSSONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Committee to Support the Recall, etc. v. LoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023