Curtis Morrison v. Mark Peterson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Prisoner Curtis Lee Morrison made two unsuccessful motions in California State court for post-conviction DNA testing under California Penal Code § 1405. He then brought this action, seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court dismissed the action on the merits.
On appeal, the court appointed pro bono counsel, who provided valuable assistance to Morrison and the court. Morrison pursues a facial challenge to two provisions of the statute, and an as-applied challenge to a third. We reject those challenges, and affirm the decision of the district court.
F…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- George Young, Jr. v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Seanlim Yith v. Kirstjen NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Stacey Johnson v. Tim GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- State v. LeggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Ray Cromartie v. Bradfield Shealy, Randa WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.