Legal Opinion

Curtis Morrison v. Mark Peterson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2015No. 13-15675PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Prisoner Curtis Lee Morrison made two unsuccessful motions in California State court for post-conviction DNA testing under California Penal Code § 1405. He then brought this action, seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court dismissed the action on the merits.

On appeal, the court appointed pro bono counsel, who provided valuable assistance to Morrison and the court. Morrison pursues a facial challenge to two provisions of the statute, and an as-applied challenge to a third. We reject those challenges, and affirm the decision of the district court.

F…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. George Young, Jr. v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Seanlim Yith v. Kirstjen NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Stacey Johnson v. Tim GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  4. State v. LeggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  5. Ray Cromartie v. Bradfield Shealy, Randa WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API