Legal Opinion
Rio Grande Kennel Club v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 2008No. 27,207PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} The Rio Grande Kennel Club and a number of individual dog owners, kennel owners, and veterinarians (collectively, Plaintiffs) filed a complaint in the district court seeking declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against the City of Albuquerque (the City) regarding the City’s Humane and Ethical Animal Regulations and Treatment ordinance (HEART). HEART regulates the ownership and care of certain animals. Plaintiffs sought to have HEART declared unconstitutional for numerous reasons. The City moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims. After considering the arguments,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4219, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5827 the San Remo Hotel Thomas Field Robert Field T & R Investment Corp. v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation Department of City Planning Board of Permit Appeals San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lohman v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Starko, Inc. v. PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH PLANNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Davis v. Devon Energy Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission. Ass'n. v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Starko, Inc. v. Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Village of Angel Fire v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.