Legal Opinion

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4219, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5827 the San Remo Hotel Thomas Field Robert Field T & R Investment Corp. v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation Department of City Planning Board of Permit Appeals San Francisco Board of Supervisors

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1998No. 16-56057PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

145 F.3d 1095

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4219, 98 Daily Journal

D.A.R. 5827

THE SAN REMO HOTEL; Thomas Field; Robert Field; T & R

Investment Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation;

Department of City Planning; Board Of Permit

Appeals; San Francisco Board of

Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-16843.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1997.

Decided June 3, 1998.

Andrew M. Zacks and Paul F. Utrecht, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Andrew W. Schwartz, Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Porter v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Kenneth Scott Nivens Glen Lance Maners Terri Lynn Stork v. Peter S. Gilchrist, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Clark v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Addiction Specialists, Inc. v. The Township of Hampton, the Township of Hampton Council and the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API