Legal Opinion

Davis v. Devon Energy Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2009No. 30,956, 30,957, 30,958PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHÁVEZ, Chief Justice.

{1} In these consolidated class actions, Plaintiff royalty owners allege on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated that Defendant gas producers have improperly deducted from Plaintiffs’ royalty payments the costs of making coalbed methane (CBM) gas “marketable.” Plaintiffs claim that despite the differing language in the various royalty agreements, Defendants in every case have breached an implied covenant prohibiting Defendants from deducting the costs of gathering, treating, and otherwise making the CBM gas marketable once it has been produced.

{2}…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  2. State Ex Rel. King v. B&B Investment Group, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
  3. ConocoPhillips Co. v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. MendezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Anderson Living Trust v. Conocophillips Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API