Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Wickliffe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1982No. 12242Published

1ConcurrenceHogan, Judge

Although I agree the correct result has been reached in the principal opinion, I have arrived at that conclusion by a route somewhat different from the majority. Almost certain that I shall sound officious, I wish to state my reasons separately.

I have no difficulty finding jurisdiction of the appeal in this court. In this case, as in Ederer v. Dalton, 618 S.W.2d 644 (Mo. banc 1981), and Street v. Maries County R-1 Sch. Dist. of Maries County, 511 S.W.2d 814 (Mo.1974), the controversy was focused upon the necessity and manner of submitting a school district tax levy to a popular vote. In both…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Barker v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Smith v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Klocke v. KlockeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  5. Dickey v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API