Wachacha v. Wachacha
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
The separation agreement executed by the parties contained the following provision: “If and when it is no longer necessary-for the party of the first part [the husband] to pay for the support of the party of the second part, [the wife] it is understood and agreed between the parties hereto that he, the said party of the first part will furnish adequate support for his minor child sufficient to retain the standard of living to which he had been accustomed. . . .” Plaintiff-husband challenges the conclusion in the court’s order that this phrase “was intended by the parties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Charlotte v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Mullen v. SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Rothman v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Bowes v. BowesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Stan D. Bowles Distributing Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Carpenter v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.