Legal Opinion

Stan D. Bowles Distributing Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1984No. 838SC428PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

I

The facts giving rise to this action are that plaintiff and defendant Pabst entered into a written distributorship agreement on 23 January 1975. Plaintiff was a wholesale distributor for alcoholic malt beverage products. Defendant Pabst was a national brewer “engaged in the manufacture and sale of Pabst beer and Pabst ale.” The agreement granted plaintiff the right to sell “Pabst beer and ale” in the counties of Wilson, Greene, Wayne, and Lenoir. The agreement also provided that “[notwithstanding the use hereinafter of the words ‘beer and ale’ and ‘beer or ale,’ or the use of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. C M Corporation, Continental Manors, Inc. And Commercial Management, Inc. v. Oberer Development Company and Gold Key Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Loos & Dilworth v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. In re R.A.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Severn Peanut Co., Inc. v. Industrial Fumigant Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Smith v. Beaufort County Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Ball v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API