Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Sawyer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 21, 1971No. 51PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

At common law the father’s duty to support his children did not survive the father’s death. Gray v. Gray, 273 N.C. 319, 160 S.E. 2d 1. This rule obtained even though the children were minors. Elliott v. Elliott, 235 N.C. 153, 69 S.E. 2d 224. As was said in Layton v. Layton, 263 N.C. 453, 139 S.E. 2d 732:

“ ‘The relationship of parent and child is a status, and not a property right.’ 67 C.J.S., Parent and Child, § 2, p. 628. At common law it is the duty of a father to support his minor children. Elliott v. Elliott, 235 N.C. 153, 69 S.E. 2d 224; Green v. Green, 210 N.C. 147, 185…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Blades v. SzataiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Stone v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. Charlotte Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. MacKay v. McIntoshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mezzanotte v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Redevelopment Com'n of Greenville v. HannafordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Abrego v. AbregoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API