Mullen v. Sawyer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
At common law the father’s duty to support his children did not survive the father’s death. Gray v. Gray, 273 N.C. 319, 160 S.E. 2d 1. This rule obtained even though the children were minors. Elliott v. Elliott, 235 N.C. 153, 69 S.E. 2d 224. As was said in Layton v. Layton, 263 N.C. 453, 139 S.E. 2d 732:
“ ‘The relationship of parent and child is a status, and not a property right.’ 67 C.J.S., Parent and Child, § 2, p. 628. At common law it is the duty of a father to support his minor children. Elliott v. Elliott, 235 N.C. 153, 69 S.E. 2d 224; Green v. Green, 210 N.C. 147, 185…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Blades v. SzataiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Stone v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. Charlotte Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- MacKay v. McIntoshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mezzanotte v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Redevelopment Com'n of Greenville v. HannafordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Abrego v. AbregoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.