State ex rel. Hill v. Wabash Railroad
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Ray Circuit Court. — Hon. E. J. Broaddus, Judge. (1) The county court properly levied and assessed the tax of twenty cents on the one hundred dollars valuation under and pursuant to the mandate of the circuit court. R. S. 1889, sec.- 7653, as amended by Laws 1893, p. 219; R. S. 1889, sec. 7654; (2) This statute is legal and valid and is in aid of section 12, article 10, Constitution.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Ray Circuit Court. — Hon. E. J. Broaddus, Judge. (1) The county court properly levied and assessed the tax of twenty cents on the one hundred dollars valuation under and pursuant to the mandate of the circuit court. R. S. 1889, sec.- 7653, as amended by Laws 1893, p. 219; R. S. 1889, sec. 7654; (2) This statute is legal and valid and is in aid of section 12, article 10, Constitution. Andrew County ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 38; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 130 Mo-. 248; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 86 Mo. 237; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 113 Mo. 299; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 97 Mo.…
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
— This is an action to1 enforce a tax lien against defendant’s property in Ray county.
The tax sued for was levied by the county court of that county under and in pursuance of an order of the circuit court of said county by authority of section 7654, Revised Statutes 1889, section 9274, Revised Statutes 1899, and sections following.
The petition is in two counts, the only difference in them being that the first count is for special taxes levied for the year 1896, amounting to $876.91, penalties, commissions and' attorney’s fees, and the other for special taxes levied for the year 1897,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Buchanan v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Aurora Water Co. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Book v. EarlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Barnard & Co. v. Knox CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Prince v. City of QuincyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Emerson v. City of Mound CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Strother v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Authorizing Issuance of Funding Bonds Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 4 v. DaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- State ex rel. Faulconer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Philpott v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.