Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Faulconer v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1911No. 17,920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

By section 5 of chapter 245 of the Laws of 1909, Cowley county for current expenses is limited to a levy of 1.12 mills. Pursuant to the provisions of section 33 of chapter 248 of the Laws of 1911 the county board levied 1 mill road tax in addition to the levy for current expenses. This suit was brought to enjoin the collection of this tax, and the plaintiff taxpayers assert that the levy was void and in excess of the limit fixed by section 5 of the act of 1909 — in other words, that a road tax is a part of the current expense tax and is not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Reed v. Commissioners of Marion CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Howard v. HulbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Board of Commissioners of Osborne County v. BlakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Hill v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dolezal v. BostickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. In Re Settlement of WrobleskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Town of Swan River v. County of ChippewaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. City of Emporia v. GriffithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API