Legal Opinion

Application of Myer Freed

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 14, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8215PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

Freed appeals from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which sustained the examiner’s rejection of the claims in his application 1 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 103.

THE INVENTION

Three of the four claims on appeal define the invention as a method of producing calcium pantothenate “consisting of reacting in a single reaction step and under substantially anhydrous conditions, beta alanine, pantoyl lactone and calcium carbide.” Calcium pantothenate, according to appellant

is old and well known to the art. It is usually prepared as an intermediate in the pathway for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re TatinclouxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Laszlo Marosi, Joachim Stabenow, and Matthias SchwarzmannCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. In re SaetherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Application of Charles J. Esterhoy, Jr. And William D. Hunter, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API