Legal Opinion

Application of Charles J. Esterhoy, Jr. And William D. Hunter, Jr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1971No. Patent Appeal 8456PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, which affirmed the rejection of all claims in appellants’ application 1 as unpatentable in view of the prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

THE INVENTION

The subject matter of the application on appeal relates to the so-called “wet-process” for the production of phosphoric acid. It appears from the record that the acid product of the above-mentioned process (which in essence consists in treating naturally-occurring phosphate rock with a strong mineral acid, such as sulphuric…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Myer FreedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Pfizer v. Apotex (Formerly Known as Torpharm)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API