Legal Opinion

In Re Laszlo Marosi, Joachim Stabenow, and Matthias Schwarzmann

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 22, 1983No. Appeal 83-544PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACK R. MILLER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Appeals (“board”) affirming the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims 1 2-4, 11, 13, 15, 16, and 18-20, for anticipation, 35 U.S.C. § 102, or obviousness, 35 U.S.C. § 103, and indefiniteness, 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

THE INVENTION

Appellants claim a process for making zeolitic compounds. The various natural and synthetic zeolites are characterized by a microporous structure (with pores of approximately molecular…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. In re BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. In re BestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. In re MattisonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. Application of Myer FreedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. M-I LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Oakley, Inc. v. Sunglass Hut International, Lenscrafters, Inc., Ray Ban Sun Optics, Luxottica Group S.P.A., and Leonardo Del VecchioCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API