In Re Laszlo Marosi, Joachim Stabenow, and Matthias Schwarzmann
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JACK R. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Appeals (“board”) affirming the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims 1 2-4, 11, 13, 15, 16, and 18-20, for anticipation, 35 U.S.C. § 102, or obviousness, 35 U.S.C. § 103, and indefiniteness, 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
THE INVENTION
Appellants claim a process for making zeolitic compounds. The various natural and synthetic zeolites are characterized by a microporous structure (with pores of approximately molecular…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In re BestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re MattisonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Application of Myer FreedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. M-I LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Oakley, Inc. v. Sunglass Hut International, Lenscrafters, Inc., Ray Ban Sun Optics, Luxottica Group S.P.A., and Leonardo Del VecchioCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.