Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Diane M. Dillon

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 9, 1990No. 88-1245Published

1Dissent

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge,

with whom COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge, join, dissenting.

The court today resolves certain disparities in the extensive body of precedent on the question of obviousness of new chemical compounds and compositions. However, these disparities are resolved in a way that is contrary to the weight and direction of this precedent, as embodied in over three decades of decision. The court departs from its considered development of the law governing patentability of new chemical compounds and compositions, and reinstates a rule of “structural obviousness”.…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API