Legal Opinion

City of Hutchins v. Prasifka

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1970No. B-1702PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Frank, Louis and Jerry Prasifka, instituted this action to enjoin the City of Hutchins from interfering with their use of 44 acres of land within the city. The city filed a cross-action to enjoin the Prasifkas from using their property in violation of a zoning ordinance.

Trial was to the court without a jury which resulted in a judgment that all parties take nothing. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed. Both the city and the Prasifkas appealed. 1 The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment and, in effect, rendered judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Texas Co. v. State & Duval County Ranch Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. City of Fort Worth v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. City of San Angelo v. DeutschTexas Supreme Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Dillard v. Austin Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Video International Production, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Warner-Amex Cable Communications, Inc., the City of Dallas, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of White Settlement v. Super Wash, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API