Legal Opinion
Cagle v. Davis
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided December 18, 1980No. CIV-2-80-100PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NEESE, District Judge.
The petitioner Mr. Sheridan Ray Cagle, a person represented by retained counsel and in custody of the respondent warden pursuant to the judgment of November 27, 1972 of the Criminal Court of Hamblen County, Tennessee, applied to this Court for the federal writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he is in such custody in violation of his federal rights to due process of law, * Constitution, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and to a reasonably representative jury of the state and district wherein the crime was committed, Taylor v. Louisiana (1975), 419 U.S.…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SingletonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. A.W.J.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Cagle v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Hill v. RoseDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983