Hill v. Rose

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, Senior District Judge,

Sitting by Designation.

The respondent-warden filed a timely answer. See order of March 14, 1983 herein. He concedes the exhaustion by the petition er of his available remedies in the courts of Tennessee under its laws as to each federal question presented herein. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b).

Among the claims of the applicant is that he is in custody of the respondent-warden pursuant to the judgment of a Court of Tennessee in violation of the Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process Clause, and of the Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause,…