Legal Opinion

State v. Singleton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1993PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

We granted review in this case at the state’s request, in order to review a ruling by the Court of Criminal Appeals allowing the trial court to force unwilling police witnesses to submit to pretrial interviews with defense counsel.

The defendant, James “Jap” Singleton, was convicted of selling marijuana to four undercover police officers. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction, finding that the trial court had prejudiced the defendant by refusing to grant him interviews with the state’s only witnesses, the undercover agents. As relief, the intermediate…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. United States v. Donald Wayne Rich A/k/a, Lyle LuncefordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Kardy v. SHOOK, J.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Bobby Ray Kines v. Fred Butterworth, Ronald St. Pierre v. Fred ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. BiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. McGuire v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Radford v. LovelaceKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re NHC-Nashville Fire LitigationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  5. State v. MurtaghAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API