Legal Opinion
Hurley v. TCF Banking & Savings, F.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 3, 1987No. C1-87-1097PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants, the Hurleys, on behalf of themselves and a purported class, sued respondent Twin City Federal (TCF) for fraud and negligent misrepresentation, based on statements TCF made in 1982 in a solicitation letter to appellants and other bank customers. The Hurleys moved in their complaint for class certification. 1 The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted and granted judgment on the pleadings. The Hurleys appeal. We affirm.
FACTS
For purposes of this appeal, TCF and the Hurleys agree on the underlying facts.
In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Tatone v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Rognlien v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Faimon v. Winona State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.