Legal Opinion

Heald v. Granholm

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 28, 2006No. 2:00-cv-71438PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COLLECT ATTORNEY FEES FROM INTERVENING DEFENDANT

FRIEDMAN, Chief Judge.

This matter is presently before the court on the sole remaining issue, which is contained within plaintiffs’ motion for attorney fees — namely, whether plaintiffs, as prevailing parties, are entitled to recover attorney fees and costs from the intervening defendant. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2), the court shall decide this issue without oral argument. All other aspects of plaintiffs’ motions for attorney fees and costs have been settled.

The facts of the case are well…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Granholm v. HealdSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. ZipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Planned Parenthood Of Central New Jersey v. * The Attorney General Of The State Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Charles v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Carolina Green Party v. North Carolina State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024
  2. Personhuballah v. AlcornDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API