Legal Opinion

American Natl. Insurance Co. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 14, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrcwnover, J.

This is an action to recover $500, the proceeds of a life insurance policy- The plaintiff obtained a judgment below and the defendant has appealed in error.

The evidence shows that Cullom & Ghertner, a printing establishment in Nashville, took out a group policy of insurance on the lives of its employees. Among the employees insured was Irene Ezell, and her mother, Mrs. Lena Jackson, was named as beneficiary in her certificate.

Irene Ezell had been employed by the Company for two years. She received, her wages by the week, but she was employed for no definite length of time. Every Saturday she…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Duval v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. Marquet v. Aetna Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Thompson v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Leach v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Savage v. Spur Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  2. McCall v. OldenburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  3. Murphy v. Equitable Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. Modin v. New York Central Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. BroomeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API