Legal Opinion

McCall v. Oldenburg

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 26, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

This action, as amended, was brought by complainants J. H. McCall and Kurt Henze seeking' (1) damages from the defendants for breach of their employment contracts with complainants, and (2) seeking a declaration by the Chancellor that the defendants, by terminating their relationship with complainants without giving a month’s notice, had forfeited their claim to sales commissions earned but not received by complainants at the time defendants terminated their employment. Defendants, denying any breach of contract by them, sought to recover the sales commissions in question.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Savage v. Spur Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  2. Godson v. MacFaddenTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Combs v. Standard Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Delzell v. PopeTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  5. American Natl. Insurance Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chavez v. Broadway Electric Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  2. Little v. Federal Container CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  3. Bonastia v. Berman Bros., Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
  4. Grant L. Parham, Jr. v. James L. Hardaway, Etc., Department of Education of the State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. Garrison v. Lannom Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API