Bocek Bros. v. Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arises from condemnation proceedings initiated by Anchorage against property owned by Bocek Brothers (Bocek), a partnership. The property consists of a single lot, two-thirds of which is zoned for high density residential usage, R-2, and one-third of which is zoned for light industrial usage, I-l. 1 This condition is normal ly referred to as split-zoning. 2 R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning 3d § 9.12 (1986). Bocek does not contest the zoning. Rather, at issue is whether the R-2 portion of the lot' may be used to provide off-street parking and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bow & Arrow Manor, Inc. v. Town of West OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Consolidated Management, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Hertz v. BerzanskeAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Borkowski v. SnowdenAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1993