Legal Opinion
N. Fluegelman & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 6, 1930No. 85PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The order to cease and desist directs that “the respondent * * * cease and desist, directly or indirectly, from using the word ‘Satinmaid/ or any word or words, or combination of words, embracing the word ‘satin’ as a trade name for, or to describe or designate a cotton fabric offered for sale or sold in interstate commerce.”
The petitioner’s business is that of converting cotton fabrics, silk and cotton fabrics, rayon fabrics, combinations of cotton and artificial silk fabrics, and selling them to wholesale and retail dealers in the several states of the United States.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Brougham v. Blanton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Federal Trade Commission v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
- Goldsmith v. Standard Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Perloff v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Federal Trade Commission v. Army and Navy Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Federal Trade Commission v. Real Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.