Legal Opinion
Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 20, 1945No. 8407PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, circuit judge.
The petitioner in this case has been manufacturing overcoats in the City of Philadelphia, Pa. for the last 30 years. In 1930 it developed a cloth for such coats consisting of a combination of alpaca, mohair and wool fibers, on a cotton backing. This was inexpensive and designed for warmth and long wear. The purpose of adding the cotton was to obtain a denser face for the garment than possible with animal fibers alone. That same year the petitioner corporation gave the name “Alpacuna” to the coats. Within two years, the petitioner brought out a top coat which it also…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Perloff v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- National Lead Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Bankers Securities Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Korber Hats, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.