Legal Opinion

Brougham v. Blanton Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 1919No. 247PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH'CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

Appellants are officers of the Department of'Agriculture charged with the administration of the meat inspection acts. The appellee, Blanton Manufacturing Company, is a manufacturer of oleomargarine and brought this suit against appellants to enjoin and restrain them from interfering with it in the use of the word '“Creamo” as a trade-mark in the manufacture and sale of its product and the use of that mark upon packages of its product shipped from St. Louis in interstate commerce..

The District Court granted the injunction and its decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 243 Fed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. United States v. Coca Cola Co. of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Homer v. The CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1864

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Sexton v. Mount Olivet Cemetery Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Pacific Trading Company v. Wilson and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Churchill Tabernacle v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Armour and Company v. Orville L. Freeman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API