Kaplan v. MAMELAK
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
Larry Kaplan appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his medical malpractice complaint against Adam N. Mamelak, M.D. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Appellant Larry Kaplan suffered pain from a herniated disk in his spine. The disk, identified as T8-9, lay between the eighth and ninth thoracic (chest) vertebrae of his spinal column. Kaplan sought treatment from respondent neurosurgeon Adam Mamelak, M.D. In July 2002, respondent operated on Kaplan’s spine, intending to excise the herniated portion of disk T8-9 to relieve Kaplan’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Perin v. HayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Woolley v. HendersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Bang v. Charles T. Miller HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yun Hee So v. Sook Ja ShinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Daley v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Doe v. KachruCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Stewart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017