Doe v. Kachru

Filed 10/13/25 See dissenting opinion CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE JANE DOE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A168669 v. AMITA KACHRU, (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CGC-21-595416) Defendant and Respondent. I. INTRODUCTION Appellants Jane and John Doe allege they selected the medical facility where their child was born based on publications and marketing materials that led them to expect “privacy,” “round-the-clock midwifery support,” and delivery care consistent with “evidence-based,…